The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(+(x, y), z) → +(x, +(y, z))
+(f(x), f(y)) → f(+(x, y))
+(f(x), +(f(y), z)) → +(f(+(x, y)), z)

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
+(f(x), f(y)) →⁺ f(+(x, y))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
The pumping substitution is [x / f(x), y / f(y)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)